18. Sparse Signal Models#

concepts

18.1. Outline#

In this chapter we develop initial concepts of sparse signal models.

We begin our study with a review of solutions of under-determined systems. We build a case for solutions which promote sparsity.

We show that although the real life signals may not be sparse yet they are compressible and can be approximated with sparse signals.

We then review orthonormal bases and explain the inadequacy of those bases in exploiting the sparsity in many signals of interest. We develop an example of Dirac Fourier basis as a two ortho basis and demonstrate how it can better exploit signal sparsity compared to Dirac basis and Fourier basis individually.

We follow this with a general discussion of redundant signal dictionaries. We show how they can be used to create sparse and redundant signal representations.

We study various properties of signal dictionaries which are useful in characterizing the capabilities of a signal dictionary in exploiting signal sparsity.

In this chapter, our signals of interest will typically lie in the finite N-dimensional real or complex vector space RN or CN. Sometimes we will restrict our attention to the N dimensional Euclidean space to simplify discussion.

We will be concerned with different representations of our signals of interest in CD where DN. This aspect will become clearer as we go along in this chapter.

18.2. Sparsity#

We quickly define the notion of sparsity in a signal.

We recall the definition of l0-“norm” (don’t forget the quotes) of xCN given by

x0=card(supp(x))

where supp(x)={i:xi0} denotes the support of x and card denotes the cardinality of a set. Informally we say that a signal xCN is sparse if x0N.

More generally if

x=Dα

where DCN×D with D>N is some signal dictionary (to be formally defined later), then x is sparse in dictionary D if α0D.

Sometimes we simply say that x is K-sparse if x0K where K<N. We do not specifically require that KN.

An even more general definition of sparsity is the degrees of freedom a signal may have.

Example 18.1 (Degrees of freedom on the surface of a sphere)

  1. Consider all points on the surface of a unit sphere in RN.

  2. For every point x belonging to the surface, we have x2=1.

  3. Thus if we choose the values of N1 components of x then the value of the remaining component is automatically fixed.

  4. Thus the number of degrees of freedom x has on the surface of the unit sphere in RN is N1.

  5. Such a surface represents a manifold in the ambient Euclidean space.

  6. Of special interest are low dimensional manifolds where the number of degrees of freedom KN.